
A SHAMELESS WORSHIP OF HEROES
by Will Durant
Of the many ideals which in
youth gave life a meaning and radiance missing
from the chilly perspectives of middle age, one
at least has remained with me as bright and
satisfying as ever before -- the shameless
worship of heroes. In an age that would level
everything and reverence nothing, I take my stand
with Victorian Carlyle, and light my candles,
like Mirandola before Plato's image, at the
shrines of great men.
I say shameless,
for I know how unfashionable it is now to
acknowledge in life or history any genius loftier
than ourselves. Our democratic dogma has leveled
not only all voters but all leaders; we delight
to show that living geniuses are only
mediocrities, and that dead ones are myths.
If we may believe
Mr. Wells, Caesar was a numbskull and Napoleon a
fool. Since it is contrary to good manners to
exalt ourselves, we achieve the same result by
slyly indicating how inferior are the great men
of the earth. In some of us, perhaps, it is a
noble and merciless asceticism, which would root
out of our hearts the last vestige of worship and
adoration, lest the old gods should return and
terrify us again.
For my part, I
cling to this final religion, and discover in it
a content and stimulus more lasting than came
from the devotional ecstasies of youth. How
natural it seemed to greet Rabindranath Tagore by
that title which so long has been given him by
his countrymen, Gurudeva
"Revered Master." For why should we
stand reverent before waterfalls and mountain
tops, or a summer moon on a quiet sea, and not
before the highest miracle of all -- a man who is
both great and good? So many of us are mere
talents, clever children in the play of life,
that when genius stands in our presence we can
only bow down before it as an act of God, a
continuance of creation. Such men are the very
life-blood of history, to which politics and
industry are but frame and bones.
Part cause of the
dry scholasticism from which we were suffering
when James Harvey Robinson summoned us to
humanize our knowledge, was the conception of
history as an impersonal flow of figures and
"facts," in which genius played so
inessential a role that histories prided
themselves upon ignoring them. It was to Marx
above all that this theory of history was due; it
was bound up with a view of life that distrusted
the exceptional man, envied superior talent, and
exalted the humble as the inheritors of the
earth. In the end men began to write history as
if it had never been lived at all, as if no drama
had ever walked through it, no comedies or
tragedies of struggling or frustrated men. The
vivid narratives of Gibbon and Taine gave way to
ash-heaps of irrelevant erudition in which every
fact was correct, documented, and dead.
No, the real
history of man is not in prices and wages, nor in
elections and battles, nor in the even tenor of
the common man; it is in the lasting
contributions made by geniuses to the sum of
human civilization and culture. The history of
France is not, if one may say it with all
courtesy, the history of the French people; the
history of those nameless men and women who
tilled the soil, cobbled the shoes, cut the
cloth, and peddled the goods (for these things
have been done everywhere and always) -- the
history of France is the record of her
exceptional men and women, her inventors,
scientists, statesmen, poets, artists, musicians,
philosophers and saints, and of the additions
which they made to the technology and wisdom, the
artistry and decency, of their people and
mankind. And so with every country, so with the
world; its history is properly the history of its
great men. What are the rest of us but willing
brick and mortar in their hands, that they may
make a race a little finer than ourselves?
Therefore I see history not as a dreary scene of
politics and carnage, but as the struggle of man
-- through genius -- with the obdurate inertia of
matter and the baffling mystery of mind; the
struggle to understand, control and remake
himself and the world.
I see men standing
on the edge of knowledge, and holding the light a
little farther ahead; men carving marble into
forms ennobling men; men molding peoples into
better instruments of greatness; men making a
language of music and music out of language; men
dreaming of finer lives, and living them. Here is
a process of creation more vivid than in any
myth, a godliness more real than in any creed.
To contemplate
such men, to insinuate ourselves through study
into some modest discipleship to them, to watch
them at their work and warm ourselves at the fire
that consumes them -- this is to recapture some
of the thrill that youth gave us when we thought,
at the altar or in the confessional, that we were
touching or hearing God.
In that dreamy
youth we believed that life was evil, and that
only death could usher us into paradise. We were
wrong; even now -- while we live -- we may enter
it. Every great book, every work of revealing
art, every record of a devoted life is a call and
an open sesame to the Elysian Fields.
Too soon we
extinguished the flame of our hope and our
reverence. Let us change the icons, and light the
candles again.

|